The CLARITY Act is heading into the final stretch before a make-or-break Senate vote. Donald Trump’s ethics concession has helped remove one sticking point around the crypto bill, but now 18 state attorneys general are pushing back against the latest version. They argue the proposed changes would weaken state-level oversight.

What Happened

As lawmakers gear up for the crucial Senate vote on the CLARITY Act, Trump’s ethics concession has addressed one of the main obstacles blocking the bill. Still, a coalition of 18 state AGs is going public with their opposition to the revised text, saying it could undermine effective enforcement and oversight in their jurisdictions.

Where the States Stand

The attorneys general say the updated bill could strip away some of the tools states use to supervise and enforce crypto market rules locally. In their view, that would make it harder to protect consumers and keep tabs on digital asset players operating within state lines.

What’s Next for the Bill

The CLARITY Act is closing in on its Senate vote, which will set the course for what happens next. At stake is how crypto oversight will be structured: supporters want clearer rules, while critics worry states could lose some of their enforcement power. We’ll know more about any last-minute compromises or amendments once the votes are in.